Iliad Intensive

October 2026

Before
Join the Iliad Discord and check you can see #intensive-october. That is where you post any material you need to share with participants. If you can't see it, tell Leonard (@leonardbereska on Discord).
During
At 17:10, make sure everyone fills out the feedback form.
After
Fill out the end-of-day log: rate the day and tell us anything that went wrong.
Fill out Who stood out: name anyone who made a positive impression.
  • Questions about pay, travel, logistics or materials: see the FAQ.

66 project proposals are open for review. Stars, a sentence, or both. Read them.

[B.6]Physics of Deep Learning Wed 14 Oct, leading 26 responses · energy 4.0/5
Overall +1.13 better than expected n = 24
Content +0.88 better than expected n = 24
Clarity +0.63 better than expected n = 24
Motivation +0.42 better than expected n = 24
Exercises +0.54 better than expected n = 24
Readings +0.67 better than expected n = 24
Other activities +0.47 better than expected n = 19
Pace +0.25 too fast n = 24
Difficulty +0.33 too hard n = 24
Novelty +0.58 mostly new n = 24
Read what they wrote28
Worked well10
  • Pacing ws excellent
  • I enjoyed the lecture format.
  • The lecture was super super clear, well explained, and nicely paced.
  • the structure was really good
  • This content was exactly what I came to the intensive to learn. I wish we had more lectures on exactly these topics. Readings and exercises were well selected.
  • HELL YES!! clear, structured, well paced lecture on fascinating and difficult material. this is all i wanted from this day and i wished more of the days were like this. perfect mix of lectures and exercises and discussion too
  • The schedule and lecture materials were well planned.
  • The excercises.
  • quality and clarity of presentation
  • The format of the delivery was excellent: excellent choices were made about what to cover. Also, the exercises generated productive discussion and advanced my understanding of what is going on.
Would improve12
  • Was excellent
  • This was interesting in the sandbox/toy setups used to study mathematical properties of NNs/LLMs but I didn't end up with much optimism about its application/potential to better understanding actual applications to LLM research.
  • nothing.
  • There are sessions that feel too open-ended, leaving too many things to explore. Would be nice to switch back to structured lectures.
  • This was the best lecture of the intensive so far. I wish we had this Tudor teaching for another few days. There is literally nothing I could suggest to improve it.
  • nothing
  • It felt like the first two lectures were very dense but the third lecture was actually pretty light. I think the time could be distributed so that there was a little more time spent on the same material in the first two lectures and less on the third.
  • It would be helpful if lectures included explanations of relevance to AI safety & interpretability, both short-term and in the long-term.
  • The lecture, exercises, and notes were very well organized. Can't think of anything else to add within the time limit for the topic.
  • It was wonderful lecture!
  • nothing comes to mind
  • More time to digest the many ideas present here.
Changed my mind6
  • I had no prior knowledge of physics inspired neural nets of deep learning. This lecture inspired me to learn deeper into it.
  • I enjoyed the content today.
  • I have more hope that a theory of learning mechanics is possible.
  • Haven't changed my mind on anything really.
  • I'm slightly more convinced about learning mechanics being achievable at some point in the future.
  • unsure of how i can fit in when ive only done my undergrad
10:00 Lecture starts
12:30 Lunch at Mox
13:30 Afternoon session
17:10 Feedback form
17:30 Day ends. Dinner